|
Sir
Jackie Stewart doesn’t have short-term relationships with his personal
sponsors. In 2008 he celebrates 40 years with the Rolex watch company
The Ambassador
In
2008 Sir Jackie Stewart is celebrating his 40th anniversary as a
brand ambassador for the Rolex company. Few commercial relationships last
more than a few years, but Stewart’s has endured for four decades.
As Sir Jackie Stewart
says himself, he has been married to the same woman for 46 years and to
his sponsors for only slightly less time. In Rolex’s case, only four
years less. Almost every one of his relationships has endured since the
1960s, but none so enduringly as with Rolex. He feels so secure with them
and they with him that he says he has signed his contract for many years
without even reading it.
Stewart is hugely
proud of his relationship with Rolex.
Rolex doesn’t have many ambassadors. There is Arnold Palmer, Roger
Penske, Jean Claude Killy and Dame Kiri Te Kanawa, to name most of them.
Being a Rolex ambassador is very special and
many of the relationships go back as long as Stewart’s.
It all started in May
1966 when Stewart bought his first Rolex in Texas on his way home from the
Indianapolis 500. He bought it with his Indianapolis winnings and it was
one of the first signs that he was starting to make it as a racing driver.
He remembers: “It was a gold day date with a president bracelet which
was pretty fancy for me to buy in those days. But the Rolex was a symbol
of me thinking that I have got enough money to buy something this
exclusive.” He remembers declaring it to customs on his return to
Britain.
The first years of his
racing career had been spent virtually penniless, clawing his way to the
top, and he couldn’t even afford to run a road car. The purchase of the
Rolex marked the fact that those days were over. By 1968 he had emerged as
Britain’s top driver and one of the top five in the world. He started
winning a few races in a Matra Ford driving for Ken Tyrrell. Out of the
blue Rolex’s Andre Heiniger approached him. He remembers: “He wanted
to see if I would consider allowing them to use my photograph and
likeness.” Heiniger had also made the same calls to golfer, Arnold
Palmer and Olympic skier, Jean-Claude Killy.
Stewart is not even
sure how they knew he was a Rolex wearer. Equally he has no idea why they
have chosen to stick with him all these years, or with Killy and Palmer.
The longevity of the relationships is a marketing mystery. But the
relevance at the time was clear with three youthful sports stars at the
top of their game. The relevance now is more doubtful as all are in their
early to late 60s and appeal to an entirely different demographic than
they did then. In addition these stars have not been replaced. Rolex has
stuck to the original three.
In reality the hiring
of Stewart, Killy and Palmer was carefully thought through and Rolex
believed the three represented the cream of sportsmen of that era. Andre
Heiniger also believed that all three would endure. It was a coincidence
that the three were managed by sports agent, Mark McCormack’s IMG
organisation. McCormack had the same tastes as Rolex. Arnold Palmer was
then at the peak of his golf prowess and Killy won three Olympic golds
that year. Stewart was about to annex three world championships.
Apart from
McCormack’s recommendation, Stewart claims he has no idea why he was
picked out by Heiniger at that stage of his career. Then he was 18 months
away from his first world championship and indeed there were no guarantees
he would win one at all. He says: “It has often baffled me that they
chose me that early in my career.”
But Andre Heiniger,
the director general for 50 years, was no ordinary chief executive and he
became a legend in the watch business. Heiniger was tremendously
influential over what Rolex has become and even five years after his death
his influence is still felt through his son Patrick who is now chief
executive.
Stewart adds: “I
think they think that Arnold Palmer, Jean-Claude Killy and Jackie Stewart
are men of a similar culture, who have done whatever it is within their
own sports. The dignity of their sports is important as Rolex are heavily
into the dignity of the watch, etc. And I think it is a people
relationship with the company that is important. They are very choosy who
they use in advertising. The use Kiri Te Kanawa at the moment, who they
see to be the same type of person. Sailors and mountaineers are also
popular.”
But it is more than
that. It is a market phenomenon that Rolex considered a 28-year-old Jackie
Stewart at the start of his winning period in 1968 an asset, and still
does at the age of 68 when he has been there and done everything. Stewart
says appropriately: “They see it as timeless. Timing is everything in
life.”
But the longevity of
the relationship is still a mystery. When Stewart bought his first Rolex
he was a young man buying a high value product and then a young endorser
of the product. Now he is an older man who connects with an older
audience. It is a totally changed demographic and not as if Rolex has
replaced him at the other end of the demographic. Stewart says: “Rolex
has not changed. You can give me all sorts of excuses for wearing another
watch, but if you wear a Rolex, whether it is a stainless steel GMT
master, which I wear a lot of, or whether you wear a platinum day date, it
is a watch that everyone looks at and thinks it is a quality statement.”
Stewart believes that the longevity goes even deeper than that: “With
Rolex it is not just a question of winning, it is being successful because
a winner can always be beaten. But if you are successful you rise above
winning or losing. So maybe they think if I had behaved badly or if I had
not been successful as I had developed as a person…it is as simple as
that.”
Fortunately for Rolex
none of its ambassadors has ever behaved badly and that is a reason it
would never hire a David Beckham. And could also be a reason why it has
not replaced its veteran endorsers with younger sportsmen.
Stewart says: “There
have been a lot of racing drivers from my period and after. They were
advertising watches in 1927. I think that is the great thing about Rolex;
no one is bigger than the brand.”
Stewart can’t
remember, but it appears Rolex paid him something like US$10,000 in that
first year and used a picture of him at the Monaco Grand Prix in the 1986
Matra-Ford going down the hill in Casino Square to the Mirabeau. From then
until now he renewed the contract every five years. He describes the pay
at the time as: “A reasonable amount of money.”
It was an interesting
agreement and he had to do very little except lend his name to the brand.
In that first year, they perhaps ran three advertisements. Stewart says:
“Rolex are famous for not overdoing their relationship of any of their
people.”
Stewart also
recognised that the brand relationship has been two way and that Rolex has
rubbed off well on the ‘Jackie Stewart’ brand, as he says: “They
have also been good value for me because of my brand association, which is
something that I have guarded very jealously.”
Stewart says there is
no formal time commitment to Rolex. He says the company simply invites him
to a series of events during the year. He says: “They say to me, would
you like to come to the opening of this, you would be suitable to attend
that.” It is the most unstructured relationship he has. He says he
occasionally has to decline invitations because of prior commitments. For
example in 2004, one clashed with the Goodwood revival, another with the
British Open golf at Troon. Both events he deeply regretted missing out
on. For him, working for Rolex is a pleasurable event, as he says: “They
wanted me to play golf at Troon just before the British Open with some of
their customers and there was a clash of dates. They know I would have
loved to have played at Troon just prior to the Open. But that is
not something that you would find Rolex putting muscle on you for.”
It is a remarkable
relationship, and Stewart repays the latitude he is allowed under the
contract many times. He makes all the heritage of his career available to
use. He says: “I did an advert with David Bailey that was in the
Goodwood programme because it was 40 years since I sat in a single-seater
for the very first time at Goodwood with Ken Tyrrell and John Cooper along
with Bruce McLaren. They used a picture of me in the Tyrrell, just a
mirror shot by David Bailey of my face sitting in the Tyrrell. They will
use that for other things but they would not use that blandly, just in the
appropriate magazines. It is very soft.”
Amazingly Stewart says
the relationship has not moved with the times. He says it carries on
exactly as it was 40 years ago. Stewart says the relationship’s core is
just that people now know that he wears a Rolex. He says: “For a long
time there were pictures of me wearing my gold Rolex in my Formula One
uniform taken in Kyalami. But it was just a very casual picture that was
used by Rolex outlets and jewellers’ shops, just sitting on the counter.
It was just a gloss
picture of Jackie Stewart wearing a Rolex.”
That somewhat famous
gold Rolex, to his regret, has now been lost due to his insistence of
removing his watch before entering a race car. Stewart never wore a watch
when racing because of safety. He is aware that some current drivers wear
watches when racing but says it is dangerous. He explains: “I never wore
a watch racing on safety grounds. Some of the drivers do wear watches,
which is not correct. The biggest risk of wearing a watch, and it
sounds gruesome, it is called being de-gloved, and if something catches on
the watch and it goes that way it takes all the skin off the back of your
hands. That does not grow back and the palm is very difficult as well.”
Stewart also declines
to wear a bracelet with his blood group and never wore a ring.
Astonishingly, he says that the little details in safety are now routinely
ignored in Formula One, particularly drivers wearing watches.
Nowadays Stewart’s
contract is renewed every three or five years. His phonecall with Andre
Heiniger’s son, Patrick, has become almost routine: “When it comes up
for renewal, I either get a call from Patrick saying, ‘well Jackie, you
know the contract will end this year, I suppose that we ought to do it
again hadn’t we?’.”
It is one of
Stewart’s most personal relationships and it has never gone through his
agency. Stewart says he doesn’t actually know what his obligations are
under the contract because he claims he hasn’t read it in a very long
time. He simply says: “It is not like that at all. It is a gentlemen’s
agreement.”
A very lucrative
gentlemen’s agreement, as by all accounts it pays some US$250,000 a
year.
In 2004, a typical
year, his duties included attending the opening of a new Rolex store in
London and going to a Monterey historic event at Laguna Seca for a hectic
round of social events. He also went to the Daytona 500 where he was the
Grand Marshall.
Stewart admits he
would probably do all this for nothing. Many a time he is spotted at
Silverstone presenting the prizes for an obscure race on a Sunday
afternoon for which no one pays him.
When Stewart is gone
Rolex will seek a replacement from the world of motor racing, but he
cannot see who it might be. As well as suitability there are problems of
conflict that didn’t exist in 1968. Omega man, Michael Schumacher, could
never be a Rolex man, nether could Kimi Räikkönen or Juan Pablo Montoya.
Equally Stewart believes that Palmer and Killy will also be difficult to
replace. And this is probably the answer as to why Rolex has kept the
three men on. Replacement sportsmen are incredibly difficult to recruit
when an association is designed to last a lifetime.
Stewart says that
Rolex’s long-term thinking is highly compatible to his own thought
processes, as he explains: “I have always been a long-term thinker about
relationships. I never left Ken Tyrrell, from 1964 to 1973 when I retired.
I was under contract to Ford until the end of 2004. With Moët &
Chandon I have had a relationship with them from 1969, so these are all
long-term relationships. I have been married to Helen since 1962, what I
am saying is long-term.”
|